| 
The way the Internet is altering our habits
Blame it all on Google!
Have
you ever noticed it's getting more difficult for you to focus on reading lengthy
texts? Can you concentrate hard on the text you read online or is your attention
constantly diverted by interesting links? Do you stop reading to reply to a new
e-mail message, which keeps blinking at the bottom of your screen? Just remember
how many articles or e-mails you found intriguing and saved, saying to yourself
you will read them later. Now think about how many of them you actually read?
If the answer is few, this article is aimed at you
By ADRIJANA MILOSAVLJEVIĆ from Belgrade, SERBIA

One of the most popular
topics among bloggers lately is "The effect of the Internet on our reading
habits and habits in general". The countless blog posts on this subject were
provoked by Nicholas Carr's cover story of the July issue of Atlantic Monthly:
"Is Google Making
Us Stupid: What The Internet is doing to Our Brains". In it, he claims
there are some sweeping changes in reading habits in people who spend hours surfing
the Net. "Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to
be easy. That's rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to
drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking
for something else to do. And what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away
my capacity for concentration and contemplation. My mind now expects to take in
information the way the Net distributes it", notices Carr. Bruce
Friedman, who blogs regularly about the use of computers in medicine, sees eye
to eye with Mr Carr. "I can't read War and Peace anymore," he admitted.
"I've lost the ability to do that. Even a blog post of more than four paragraphs
is too much to absorb. " A
recently published study of online research habits, conducted by scholars from
University College London, suggests that we may well be in the midst of a sea
change in the way we read and think. As part of the five-year research program,
the scholars examined computer logs documenting the behavior of visitors to two
popular research sites, one operated by the British Library and one by a U.K.
educational consortium, that provide access to journal articles, e-books, and
other sources of written information. They found that people using the sites exhibited
"a form of skimming activity," hopping from one source to another and
rarely returning to any source they'd already visited. They typically
read no more than one or two pages of an article or book before they would "bounce"
out to another site. Sometimes they'd save a long article, but there's no evidence
that they ever went back and actually read it. The
new style of reading promoted by the Net puts "efficiency" and "immediacy"
above all else. Is it weakening our capacity for deep reading? The modern man
is used to multitasking, i.e. doing many things at the same time and doing them
NOW. The main characteristic of a Net surfer is impatience. Opinions are
mixed. Some bloggers agree the way we think is obviously changing, but that we
can only blame ourselves, not the Net. (A bad workman always blames his tools.)
Others wonder if the outcome of having machines that think is having a man that
does not. Another group calls Google their best friend who gives them a plentitude
of interesting ideas and choices. As for the Google, the company has declared
that its mission is "to organize the world's information and make it universally
accessible and useful. " They add that they seek to develop "the perfect
search engine," the one which "understands exactly what you mean and
gives you back exactly what you want." It is clear that users are
not reading online in the traditional sense; indeed there are signs that new forms
of "reading" are emerging as users "power browse" horizontally
through titles, contents pages and abstracts going for quick wins. It almost seems
that they go online to avoid reading in the traditional sense. Will the generations
to come study from print books or e-books (as it is already the case at some colleges)?
Maryanne Wolf, a psychologist says: "We are not only what we read. We are
how we read."
(Published: 10.08.2008.)
| |