| 
BCG Study: Thailand
Surfing
wireless
With appropriate initiatives and policies to stimulate
investment and rollout of wireless infrastructure, a bottom-up, cost-benefit analysis
suggests that Thailand could have 17.9M subscribers in 2020, which translates
into approximately 26 subscribers per 100 population
By WAVE
Team from Belgrade, SERBIA
Thailand
has seen rapid growth in Internet usage, increasing seven-fold over the last 8
years. However, penetration continues to lag behind regional peers. In terms of
both Internet users and broadband subscribers per 100 population, Thailand lags
behind fellow ASEAN members like Singapore, Malaysia, and even Vietnam, although
it is ahead of Indonesia and the Philippines.
This is a source of concern
for Thailand, which is focused on improving its economic competitiveness vis-à-vis
its neighbours. The low penetration rates for Internet use and broadband subscription
have been identified by the Global Competitiveness Report in 2008-2009 as a drag
on Thailand's competitiveness. Thailand's ranking for technology readiness fell
21 places to 66 in 2009, which is significantly lower than its overall ranking
of 34. Given that an earlier OECD study had found a correlation between Internet
usage and Foreign Direct Investment, this raises the spectre of Thailand suffering
a competitive disadvantage relative to its peers.
Given the current limited
penetration and coverage (outside of major cities) of fixed lines in Thailand,
it seems likely that wireless Internet technologies will be critical for Thailand
to achieve mass nationwide Internet penetration within a short timeframe. Only
1 in 4 households nationally have a fixed line, while alternative technologies
such as satellite access are prohibitively expensive. Experience from voice also
suggests a much stronger growth outlook for mobile access, relative to fixed lines.
With
appropriate initiatives and policies to stimulate investment and rollout of wireless
infrastructure, a bottom-up, cost-benefit analysis suggests that Thailand could
have 17.9M subscribers in 2020, which translates into approximately 26 subscribers
per 100 population.
Growth is initially driven by strong uptake in the
high income segments, particularly in Bangkok and other urban areas, while adoption
amongst low income groups takes off in the latter years, from 2018 onwards. Growth
in 2018 is slightly lower than the 2017 or 2019 as some high income segments reach
saturation in that year, while adoption in the low income segments has not yet
accelerated sufficiently to make up the gap.
At the household level, 70%
of households have at least one Internet subscription, with some high income households
also taking on additional wireless subscriptions. Business adoption is higher,
at around 91%. The Thai business landscape has a high proportion of small service
and manufacturing firms, and it is the relatively low penetration levels in these
segments which drives the overall penetration rate, as large businesses already
exhibit very high penetration rates. Experts believe that approximately two out
of three Internet subscriptions will be wireless.
Social benefits
Thailand
has made considerable progress on a range of social issues, such as literacy,
poverty reduction, etc. Nevertheless, the Internet has the potential to help push
it to a higher level on key areas of concern, enabling it to compete with its
South-east Asian peers. Four issues are highlighted in this report: education,
healthcare, and rural development, as well as the possible environmental benefits
the Internet can bring.
To attain these benefits, an appropriate value
chain must be put in place to promote mass Internet adoption in Thailand. Steps
must be taken to ensure that there are appropriate local content and applications,
access to Internet-enabled computers, and sufficient trained instructors to disseminate
knowhow about the Internet. This will require coordination across multiple actors,
including the government, private sector, media and local communities. Some steps
have already been taken in this direction. For example, the Meaningful Broadband
Working Group is a coalition of regulators and operators that aims to develop
broadband so that it fulfils specific public policy goals, while being commercially
viable. Its members include the National Telecommunications Commission, all the
major operators, and Chulalongkorn university. Apart from the working group, operators
have individually already undertaken steps to increase Internet awareness and
usage, e.g., TOT donated equipment and Internet access to schools in the Northeastern
regions of Thailand.
(Published: 11.10.2009.)
| |