| 
Post-election Belgium
holds EU presidency
Fears and Promises
Bart
de Wever, leader of winning N-VA, hurried to assure that the Belgium Presidency
will not be affected by its internal turmoil, as well as also stated that he will
seek to negotiate with the Socialist Party (SP), urging that "Flanders and
Wallonia must be masters of their own fate"
By ROXANA CIUPARIU (roxana.ciupariu@wavemagazine.net) from
Bucharest, ROMANIA
Following
the unresolved conflict over the electoral arrondissement of Brussels-Halle-Vilvoorde,
Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats retired from the government in spring
2010, action which stirred comments and thoughts about the possible future options.
Given this background, King Albert II dissolved the legislature, calling for
new elections, which took place on June 13, 2010. Subsequent to these elections,
the New Flemish Alliance, a centre-right political party, led by Bart
de Wever, won, having one more seat (27 in total) in comparison to the francophone
Socialist Party (PS), a social-democratic party, henceforth, making it
the dominant party in the Parliament.
Following the general elections of
June 2010 in Belgium, fears raised that this country might split even before
taking office. However, Belgium seemed quite aware of the fact that it is
the first country to work under the Lisbon Treaty provisions, and this was incentive
enough to help it set clear its priorities, putting on top of its list the economic
crisis, climate change and EU security policy. Belgium celebrated its presidency
Saturday, the 3rd of July, with simultaneous dances in 12 different Belgian
cities, thus manifesting its dedication towards both the Union and its duties
as state holding the Presidency.
Gradual split
With the New
Flemish Alliance (N-VA) in power there is the fear that what is coming up
next will be the dissolution of Belgium and the existence of Flanders separately
from Wallonia. There is a possibility of witnessing this country coming to
its end as we know it before the next elections, all in the midst of Belgian vulnerability
on the financial markets. According to Reuters, Belgium is now the third
EU member state with problems when it comes to debt-to-GDP ratio, the first two
being Greece and Italy, and might soon overcome them.
European
heads expressed their concerns over the fact that the current political circumstances,
specifically the N-VA's convictions, will have some influence over the Belgium
presidency of the EU, which started July 1st 2010. At the beginning it was thought
that the entire situation might result in Belgium's incapacity of assuming office,
but now it resides in a fear over the attention with which Belgium will handle
the most important European problems.
According to the Huffington Post,
Bart de Wever, leader of N-VA, hurried to assure that the Belgium Presidency will
not be affected by its internal turmoil, as well as also stated that he will seek
to negotiate with the Socialist Party (SP), urging that "Flanders and
Wallonia must be masters of their own fate". If a coalition with the
PS is made, PS leader Elio di Rupo could become the next Prime Minister.
Belgian elections resembled to the spring 2010 Dutch elections which resulted
in Geert Wilders' win. But, while he is commonly known for being anti-Muslim
and anti-immigration, there is an essential difference between the two men: de
Wever is pro-European, which means that he will most likely not jeopardise the
Presidency of the Council of the EU during Belgium 6-months mandate.
De
Wever did voice a desire for a split, but a gradual one. There is a fear that
the collapse of Belgium as country will, most likely, have strong negative effects
on the Eurozone as well; the country which calls itself the home of the EU institutions
and one of the six founding members of the European Communities, might be divided
over the choice for Euro, with Flanders, the richer part, being allowed to join
the Eurozone, and poor Wallonia not.
Belgian ticking bomb
Apparently,
the social and cultural differences, as well as language barriers, raise the
question if the people still want to be one state. Looking at the results
of the recent elections this seems like a good question, as it was presumed that
a strong federal government could put things into piece. But, since 2007 Belgium
has witnessed four governments until now and none seemed to make a vital improvement
in the lives of Belgians as a whole, with Flanders getting more prosperous and
Wallonia remaining poorer, all on the background of a fragile federal unity.
Whatever
will be decided, two things seem quite clear so far, and the way Belgium welcomed
its Presidency seems to confirm at least one of them: Belgium wants to hold on
to the idea of Europe and to get through well with their EU 2010 presidency; a
reorganization of Belgium is on its way, which might lead to a split or not. Fundamentally,
there is no immediate end to Belgium, but the situation is precarious, like a
ticking bomb waiting to be armed and set to explode.

(Published: 12.07.2010.)
|
|